Development of secondary mathematics higher order thinking skills assessment instrument: challenges and constraints (IR)

Puteh Marzita, Mohd Tajudin Nor’ain, Adnan Mazlini, Mohd Abdul Aziz Azrul Azwan,

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	QA Mathematics
ISSN :	0976-2612
Main Author :	Puteh Marzita, Mohd Tajudin Nor’ain, Adnan Mazlini, Mohd Abdul Aziz Azrul Azwan,
Title :	Development of secondary mathematics higher order thinking skills assessment instrument: challenges and constraints (IR)

Year of Publication :	2017
PDF Full Text :	The author has requested the full text of this item to be restricted.

Full Text :

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of using the Bar Model Method in Mathematics Year 5 based on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Key points of this study were to grade the existing capabilities of pupils in answering any mathematical questions in the form of HOTS, the pupils difficulties to answer HOTS math questions, the effectiveness of the Bar Model in improving the achievement of pupils in Year 5 in answering HOTS math questions and the Year 5 pupils' perceptions on the HOTS math questions after being exposed to the Bar Model Method. The quasi-experiment method was used with a combination of quantitative and qualitative research to answer these questions. A total of 35 pupils from a primary school in the District of Kinta, Perak were involved in this study. Quantitative data analysis used was the descriptive and inferential statistics (t-test). The qualitative analysis of the study was through the interview. The existing data proved that the ability of pupils to answer each HOTS math questions were very weak. The post-test mean scores of the pupils were significantly improved than their mean scores in the pre-test. Through the interview analysis, found that there are three main factors that contribute to the difficulty of the pupils in answering mathematics questions in HOTS which are hard to understand the questions posed, difficult to understand the requirements of the question and could not determine which operation is suitable for the question. Through the analysis of the questionnaire, there was a positive change in the pupils' perceptions of HOTS math questions after Bar Model Method was used. In conclusion, pupils perform better and also have a positive perception of HOTS mathematical problems after following the process of teaching and learning with Bar Model Method. © 2014 IASE Publisher. All rights reserved.

References

1. Abu Bakar Nordin. (2013). Kurikulum Kearah Penghasilan Kemahiran Berfikir Kritis, Kreatifdan Inovatif. Jurnal Kurikulumdan Pengajaran Asia Pasifik,1(1):10-18. 2. Andy,F. (2009) Discovering Statistic Using SPSS (Third Edit.). Sage Publications, Singapore. 3. Clark, A. (2010). Singapore math: a visual approach to word problems. Marshall Cavendish Education, Singapore. 4. Cris, P. (2004)As math skills slip, U.S. schools seek answers from Asia. The Wall Street Journal. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1102889165 14797758. 5. Curriculum Development Division (CDD).(2013). BahanSumber Peningkatan Kemahiran BerfikirAras Tinggi, Ministry of Education Malaysia, Putrajaya. 6. Kebocoran Kertas. (2014). Kebocoran kertassoalanbukanfaktorutamapenurunankep utusan UPSR. Berita Harian,http://www.bharian.com.my/node/19835. 7. King, F., Goodson, L., &Rohani, F. (2011). Higher order thinking skills: Definitions, strategies, assessment. Center for Advancement of Learning and Assessment,Tallahassee, FL; Florida State University. 8. Marzita Puteh, & Rohaidah Masri. (2006).Geometer Sketchpad: Penggunaannya dalam Pembelajaran Matematik Tambahan, Menanggapi Keberkesanan Dan Perubahan, 101–115. 9. Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE).(2012a). Laporan Awal Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025, Ministry of Education Malaysia, Putrajaya. 10.Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE).(2012b).Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggidalam Sainsdan Matematik (HOTsSM), Ministry of Education Malaysia,Putrajaya. 11.Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE).(2012c).Laporan Strategi MencapaiDasar 60:40 Aliran Sains /Teknikal: Sastera, (Mahanom Mat Sam Ed.). Ministry of Education Malaysia, Putrajaya. 12.Othman Lebar. (2015). Penyelidikan Kuantitatif: Pengenalan Kepada Teoridan Metod. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim. 13.Othman Talib. (2013). Asas Penulisan Tesis Penyelidikan & Statistik (Cetakan Pe.),Universiti Putra Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. 14.Rajendran, N.S. (2001).Pengajaran Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi: Kesediaan Guru Mengendalikan Proses Pengajaran Pembelajaran. Fakulti Sains Kognitif Dan Pembangunan Manusia, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, TanjongMalim, 15.Samsudin Drahman. (2010). Visualisasi: Satu Anjakan Dalam Teknik Penyelesaian Masalah matematik KBSR. Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan, Jil.19. 47-66. 16.Wong, K.Y. & Lee, N.H. (2009). Singapore Education and Mathematics Curriculum, in Mathematics Education: The Singapore Journeyby Wong, K.Y.; Lee, P.Y.; Berinderjeet Kaur; Foong, P.Y.; Ng S.F.;(Eds.).World Scientific, Singapore,pp.13-47. 17.ZaharahIdris. (2011). SikapMurid-murid Tahun 6 Terhadap Soalan Penyelesaian Masalah Matematik. TesisSarjana Yang Tidak Diterbitkan, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page